Barr vs. Behe - Is Intelligent Design a Valid Science?

[gbrooks9 (George Brooks, TE (E.volutionary T.heist OR P.rovidentialist))]

@JoeG

ID makes testable claims and can be potentially falsified. That alone grants it status as a scientific endeavor. ID is as useful as archaeology and forensic science in that all 3 venues seek to answer scientific questions as to how something came to be the way it is.

@JoeG

You will need to retract something somewhere.

You cannot assert that ID is a theory, but not TOE, when there is a century of scientific study on Evolution … and virtually no experimental history with ID.