I certainly agree that you would believe the natural part, or what man has been able to understand through processes of observing with science, must conform to the whole part of God’s character. We should never make statements, theological or natural, which do not align with God’s moral character, and to some degree that is of a spiritual nature. Therefore, it is appears to me that assumptions molded into various scientific methods border, if not out right falsify the data.
For instance, scientifically we can only measure the current two way speed of light. Assuming the two-way speed of light was constant throughout history…There is no known scientific possible way of knowing the one way speed of light. If this correct, how can we without question tell someone we know the approx. age of the universe based on the speed of light aka. light years? Is it called a lie if we present something as factual when we really only base this on assumptions?