-
Gen 1: 1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 The earth was invisible and empty; there was darkness on the surface of the deep, and the spirit of God moved over the waters. 3 God said, "Let there be light! And there was light… that was the first day.
-
The fossil radiation, or cosmic microwave background, is scientifically recognised as the first light in the universe. It is the fossil record of the decoupling of matter and radiation in the early universe. It was discovered in 1964 by two American engineers who were awarded the Nobel Prize.
What is the connection between the biblical phrase ‘God said, Let there be light’ and ‘the light was’? And there was light’ and ‘fossil radiation’? Is it the same light? I think that the answer to this question will leave no one indifferent, neither in the scientific world nor among theologians. And it is on the basis of this answer that the biblical scheme of creation will now have to be published as well founded.
This article is part of the Universal Cosmological Model. What I publish as part of the Universal Cosmological Model is neither sermons, nor biblical interpretations, nor concordisms. I explain the origin and development of the universe based on the biblical scheme of creation. My articles are part of theology and cosmology, which is defined as the science that studies the origin and evolution of the universe.
The cosmological schemes that scientists offer us have many limitations. It was in the Bible, where the creation story is contained, that I discovered a complete scheme. The author of the biblical diagram of creation was not scientifically literate, but he described the origin of the universe in terms that could be understood in his time. For this author, it was not about science. He was telling the origin of the universe and its evolution to demonstrate the greatness of God. Now that physics has made a science of it (cosmology), I have come to submit to them this scheme restored in the Universal Cosmological Model so that astrophysicists can validate it.
Until then, I am still focused on the events that took place in the pre-Big Bang as I discovered them in the biblical scheme of creation. For science, mathematical calculation has shown that this sphere never existed. The fact that I discovered this in the Bible is a great revolution and one of the greatest discoveries of the 21st century, because from now on it will encourage scientists to push the limits of their reasoning.
[content removed]
Until then, scholarly attention has been focused on the origin of the biblical scheme of creation. It is for the first time, through the Universal Cosmological Model, that the public is actually receiving the true explanations of the content of this scheme since it was discovered in papyri.
[content removed]
For non-cosmologists, I would like to point out that this first light has nothing to do with the light that the Sun brought to us. Here we are discussing a light that appeared before the creation of all the stars.
In the first cosmological account from antiquity, namely the biblical scheme of creation, we find that the first light appeared when “God said let there be light and there was light”. Whereas science says that the first light appeared, for some, or reappeared, for others, after 380,000 years after the Big Bang. What is the link between the appearance of the first light of the universe on the first biblical day and the fossil radiation that is scientifically recognised as being the first light of the universe that appeared or reappeared 380,000 years after the Big Bang?
I know that before reading the following, the majority of those who read me have answered inwardly that there is no connection with one slogan, “the Bible is not a scientific book”. But I ask them to read with objective judgment what follows and to put aside their erroneous consideration of the origin of the biblical scheme of creation as taught in universities and as transcribed in encyclopedias.
In the verse “God said let there be light and there was light”, even if a fictional witness was there, he would never have seen God at work dictating the appearance of light. God being invisible, the fictional witness would have simply seen a set of physical phenomena making light appear. This is why the English scientist Stephen Hawking said “the Universe did not need God to appear”. The reason is that God is always a hero in the shadows and only those who believe in Him can see His power in the accomplishment of an event.
Thus, even if in this publication we demonstrate the physical origin of this light in the verse “God said let there be light and there was light”, this does not exclude divine intervention in the shadows. Indeed, if the author of these writings, who for us is Moses, attributed this appearance by a divine word to God, it was to demonstrate that it was not a chance of nature or only a physical consequence, but that the process of the formation of the universe followed a divine plan. This is why the appearance of all the great entities was preceded by the words “God said, God was, God created”.
[content removed]
Whereas it was the real physical basis for light to appear as written in the verse " God said, ‘Let there be light’" And the light was ?
The key phenomena for us to get to the appearance of light begins with the first verse that says that “in the beginning God created… an invisible and empty earth” according to the Septuagint Bible. The earth representing a physical sphere, but the Bible tells us that this sphere was invisible, so that it was empty for a fictitious witness. This is the state of the universe at its beginning which the Bible is the only one to issue this description that went unnoticed for centuries and centuries. In fact, an invisible thing is something that exists but that we cannot see so that it seems to be empty and non-existent. So, we were only in a universe filled with energy and particles.
In fact, scientifically the vacuum in space has always been a quantum vacuum, that is, there is always the presence of energy and particles, virtual though they may be. Since these scientific terms were INEXISTENT at the time the biblical scheme of creation was written, the author of the biblical scheme of creation had to use the following words:
-
Invisible and empty earth signifying the universe at its beginning; a sphere filled with invisible matter so that it appeared to be empty to a fictitious witness.
-
The spirit, the breath, a wind from God signifying the energy of the void, a force that the author attributed to God. Scientific research is underway to determine this energy that binds the particles.
- To move on the waters means that this breath, this wind, this spirit of God on the water was not static but dynamic, that is, in action . This covers all the phenomena that are part of quantum mechanics, which seeks to elucidate how matter appeared from the vacuum and how it evolved from virtual to real.
-
The waters that simply represented the particles (from virtual to real) or the invisible matter contained in an invisible earth (universe) and empty at the beginning. In ancient times, the terms “particles and matter” did not even exist. Hence the use of the word “hydro” in the original Hebrew version, which the translators translated as waters. In the 18th century, Antoine Laurent de Lavoisier , (1743-1794), a French chemist considered the founder of modern chemistry, gave the name of hydrogen , which means what generates water, to the most abundant element in the universe, without knowing that he had just confirmed the Bible. It should also be known that according to nucleosynthesis, it is hydrogen that is the basis of the creation of all elements and all matter.
I. The appearance of the first light
So, in the verse " a wind of God moved on the waters", we are in the process of phenomena that took place in the pre-big-bang. This means that on the basis of the energy of the vacuum (God’s wind), all particles were in agitation.
In this interaction or fusion, particle-antiparticle, there was annihilation and creation and this led to the formation of an axis where everything took place. This concentration compressed the universe until making a kind of black hole called “abyss” in the Bible according to that it is written “there was darkness in the surface of the abyss”. In practice, the zones where it is hottest in the Universe are those where the matter is concentrated and very agitated as it is written biblically " a wind of God moved on the waters", causing the cosmic deflation of the matter qualified by the waters in the Bible. By confining itself more, it caused the increase of the temperature generating heat in the form of plasma which was the source of the first light of the Universe in the pre-Big-Bang described biblically in the verse "God said: Let there be light! And there was light".
If we link this verse that was thought to be independent of the previous verses, it becomes "the earth being invisible and empty, the spirit of God moving over the waters… (there appeared) light ". (Gen 1:1-3). I repeat, this discovery is made within the framework of cosmology, which tries to penetrate the mysteries that are hidden in the biblical scheme of creation, which is the first cosmological scheme from the papyri.
[content removed]
This quotation from scientific observations and experiments is the best among all that I have discovered. First of all, it answers the question why on the first biblical day, it was not written anywhere that God created the waters. Scientifically the answer was "Matter ( waters according to the Bible) is a product of … emptiness (invisible and empty earth according to the Bible). In addition, this quotation also answers the question why light comes in third position compared to the void and waters and why all these three phenomena are linked in one day by the following sentences: "Matter (waters according to the Bible), light and void interpenetrate… matter (waters according to the Bible) emits photons (light: And there was light! according to the Bible) which are couples particle/antiparticle contained in the void.
[content removed]
II. Proof that the “light is” is the cosmic radiation
[content removed]
The other proofs also do not hold when we know that the expansion of the universe is carried out at a speed more than that of light and that this should mark a shift in space between the extension of the latter and the fossil radiation. However, we notice that the fossil radiation in the Universe appears homogeneous, on a large scale, in all directions.
For the cosmos to have the same appearance at all points, some form of interaction must have been established between the distant regions of space so that their properties were homogenized. This could only be possible if the fossil radiation was already present in the condensed universe (remnant of the pre-Big-bang era) and, where all the extremes met and had the same temperature.
This hypothesis supports my prediction that the cosmic microwave background appeared as the universe was condensing and heating up in the pre-big-bang period and also justifies why these properties are part of the nature of the universe in the post-big-bang period.
There are also several hypotheses of great cosmologists such as the British scientist Roger Penrose (Nobel Prize in Physics in 2020) who claim that the Fossil Radiation is a remnant of the Pre-Big Bang. But, I am the first to predict its origin by being inspired by the Bible (Let there be light!). Thus, the link between the two lights, biblical and scientific and their origin are personal discoveries and, every time we see the image of the Cosmic Microwave Background, we can say that it is the image to which it is described in the Bible " Let there be light! and, the light was".
Flavien PHANZU MWAKA