I will try to end this exchange by showing you that the example I used was solely for the purpose of discussing what is commonly taken as evidence. The wider discussion on worldviews impacts on conclusions.
a) person was diagnosed with a medical condition = evidence
b) person stated he prayed for healing = evidence
c) person was healed = evidence
d) person attributes his healing to God as in b) = evidence
Those that do not believe in God would reject b) and d) - if they do so because they claim a-d is not evidence, they must, surely, contradict the clear evidence we are presented with.
Now I cannot see why anyone would scratch their head, or start some silly argument on what is presented. Other areas can be argued with those interested in such matters.