After the second coming of Christ, does evolution continue?

[Dale (evolutionary providentialist [now deceased])]

@Dale

@Alonzo

1. Evolution represents a major false cosmology and consequent false anthropology. It perpetuates the premise of a continued transitioning man from a primordial state toward any transition imagined.
2. The ideology of evolution fabricates false knowledge and cosmology resulting in a false anthropology.
3. Evolution attempts to undercut God’s creation of man and woman in His image by speculating they derived from lower forms of life and transitioned to higher levels.
4. When corrupted knowledge creeps in through speculations according to the faulty presumptions of evolution and redefines man, it denies the imago Dei or the image of God in man. Evolution and the imago Dei cannot co-exist.
5. Evolutionists attempt to rationlize the Bible with a hermeneutic that reads into the texts of Scripture from the view of its ideology and not from the intent of the Scriptural authors.
6. Tryanny, as the worldview of fallen humanity, is the offspring of evolution to introduce any number of anthropological possibilities and origins. When men reject God, they engage in tyranny. The Bible substantiates this truth. Language acts as the strategic gateway through indoctrination for tyranny in redefining anthropology. Atheism and deconstructionism are examples of such indoctrinating and language redefinition.

@Alonzo

Dale, you changed my statement and thereby created a strawman and misunderstood what I wrote. No one was discussing biological evolution. If you wish to reply, please do so in direct reply to what I wrote.

Of course you were talking about biological evolution – you certainly were not talking only about cosmological evolution! Or if you did not intend to mean biological evolution, you certainly did not specify. The word evolution just means change with respect to time. Clouds evolve. Is that evil?

What is an ‘evolutionist’ if you did not mean biological evolution? “Clouds evolve.” Is someone that says that an ‘evolutionist’?