Adam, Eve and Population Genetics: A Reply to Dr. Richard Buggs (Part 1)

Remember that Adam and the Genome is a popular book for a lay audience. Most lay people think “human” means us. As I’ve mentioned before, I used it in AatG as shorthand for “anatomically modern human.”

If you want an example of a paleoanthropologist using the same way of speaking, Tim White would be one (when speaking to popular audiences). For example, in this lecture he uses “human” the same way as I do in the book.

But of course, another key point in the book is that species designations are attempts to draw lines of demarcation on a continuous gradient. So whatever term one uses, it will have blur around the edges.

Edit: here’s some of the transcript of the lecture that makes the point:

5 Likes