Adam, Eve and Population Genetics: A Reply to Dr. Richard Buggs (Part 1)

No, I’m not saying that. I am saying this is my understanding of the published literature and the relevant publically-available databases. Li and Durban would be one paper relevant here; moreover the 1,000 genomes consortium papers, papers that estimate the present-day human mutation rate, and so on. For example:

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature15393

1 Like