@Daniel
Dan,
thank you for your response. For years I have been saying that Evolution as defined by Darwin has two different aspects, Variation and Natural Selection. Darwinism using modern genetics does a half way decent job of understanding Variation. However Natural Selection does not work based on Malthusian population theory as Darwinism thought. Symbiosis is much better way to understand Natural Selection.
> You can’t say “environmental change produces changes in species” - that’s Lamarckianism!
Now you throw the L word at me. That is not the way to do science. You are right, we have change when the ability to make the change and the need for the change come together.
One problem which the genetic point of view is that there are other ways to solve problems. Humans and other animals as well as plants team up with other life forms to perform the tasks they by themselves are not equipped by their genes to do, like the proverbial sharks and the pilot fish. Humans have billions of symbiots, who are not human, living in our bodies doing tasks our cells cannot do.
As I see it, every new allele is an experiment. If it is the right form at the right time, it leads to great change. Most alleles do not bring great change, but they might contain seeds of significant change. Some alleles just don’t work and never see the light of day or die a quick death.
What it is, is trying to find the right key for the right lock. Now the key is Variation and the lock is the environment or Natural Selection. There are many possible keys, but only one or a few fit the lock. In my opinion that means that Natural Selection guides evolution. It does not deny the role of genetics and other forms of Variation, but ecology decides which allele thrives and which does not.
The good thing about theistic evolution is that we know that there is a key for every lock. All life’s problems do have answers, which is something a non-believer can really say if every thing is based on chance. However there is still the possibility that humans can mess up the works so a serious catastrophe can happen. We are not protected against our own mistakes.
Changes in populations will occur caused by changing environment, because life forms that do not adapt will die out. What does CCCU stand for?
I repeat do not underestimate Dawkins as a brilliant thinker. He is not trying to be a theologian. He knows how to use words to mislead, and for some reason others do not call him on his tricks. He knows what he believes. He keeps his arguments simple, and appeals to feelings when he claims to appeal to reason. We make a serious mistake when we underestimate our opponents.