@fmiddlel
If philosophy does precede science, meaning that it is more important than science, then determining that a world view is philosophically false is to dismiss it. Again that makes sense to mind and idea people like us.
On the other hand if science, meaning facts, precedes philosophy, then the scientific “fact” that the mind is simply an illusion justifies the materialist point of view, that no philosophical reasoning can alter.
The dualist position pits philosophy and science against each other. One or the other is prior. The triune position as I have tried to say does not do this. It is not that either science, philosophy, or theology is prior. All three are prior, because all three come from God.
Neither the physical, the rational, nor the spiritual is prior or superior. They are all equally important. If something is “spiritually true,” but scientifically false like YEC, it is false. If something is “scientifically true,” but theologically false, like survival of the fittest, it is false. If something is “philosophically true,” but theologically false like Western dualism, it is false.
Science says that it superior to philosophy and theology because it demands that its ideas or theories be verified by facts. This why it is distressing when science violates this rule by not verifying how natural selection actually works. That is why it is distressing when theologians allow scientists to flout their own rules by failing to call them on this.
If theories must be based on facts, then how is philosophy and theology superior to science, which is the Other Book of God found in nature. In my opinion theology is also based on facts, but a different kind of facts than science.
Theology is based on theological facts found in the Bible, Creation ex nihilo, humans created in the Image of God, the Trinity, I AM WHO I AM, Salvation by Grace through Faith, Covenantal Relationship, et al.
These are facts found in the Bible and tested though the ages and theological truth is based on them and by testing against philosophical and scientific truth. Iron sharpens iron.
Philosophy is based on philosophical facts. The problem today is that there are no philosophical facts. The facts supposed to be the basis of dualism and monism just do not hold water in today’s world of science. We need a new set of philosophical facts or truths if we want to have a valid discipline of philosophy, or agree with Hawking and Dawkins that philosophy is kaput.