I will agree with you except for the fact that earlier we had this exchange.
I wrote:
Mitch wrote: you suggest this as the right approach: God can do everything. So you should ask God after science and medicine have tried.
I replied: But you have clearly stated that God doesn’t violate natural law, several times. It would seem to me that my cancer is following natural law of unconstrained division and growth. Since god doesn’t violate natural law, asking him for anything at this point would be an exercise in futility according to what I understand of your views. Why ask if he can’t do anything, e. g. He can’t violate natural law?
He replied:
Correct. And I don’t think he has. The point is that a lot more is often possible within the laws of nature than we often think. Simply consider what medicine can do now compared to 2000 years ago and without breaking a single law of nature. Now consider comparing this with what medicine will be able to do 2000 years from now, again without breaking a single law of nature. Yes God can do a lot without breaking the laws of nature. And one of the reasons God will not cure everyone’s cancer is because God will NOT break the laws of nature.
We have established that in a case like mine, which the cancer is about to kill me, God can’t help me because as Mitch said, “the laws of nature are more important than you getting whatever toy, candy, comfort, or easy answer you happen to want at any moment.”
How comforting that is to a terminal patient. lol. Knowing that God cares more for his natural laws than he does for me. Don’t get me wrong, I am not a whingey whiney guy and am perfectly comfortable about what is going to happen. All I am doing is analyzing what he says. He has a heartless God who leaves us on our own.
In that same post 225 I also asked:
Why ask if he can’t do anything, e. g. He can’t violate natural law?:
and He replied:
Because turning to God is the best answer to desperation compared to other kinds of things people often turn to.
If the only reason we turn to god is for comfort when we get desperation, that isn’t much of a God. It is an imaginary useless cosmic psychologist. Needless to say, he doesn’t like this comparison, but if he doesn’t like it he should stop saying things like Natural law is more important than us getting any toy, candy or comfort. lol He has created an uncaring God, or at least a God who shows us no sign of caring about our struggles here.
Given what I learned from him in the Wigner’s friend thread, that he believes that our consciousness arises from matter alone, then I see little difference between his view and that of the atheist in so far as God’s activity in this world is concerned. A mind/consciousness which arises from matter would seem to me to have zero chance of being created by God (because God doesn’t violate natural law). Thus, we humans are not creations of God but creations of our parents only.
It would seem to me that if God can’t violate his natural law, he can’t even twiddle with my immune system to make it go against the cancer–twiddling would be violating natural law of how my immune system works. He can’t do anything to stop my cancer at this stage where science’s ability is ending.
Mervin, I stand with my interpretation of Mitch’s view. It seems not only will God not be used by me; he won’t lift a finger beyond what this materialist universe offers me in the way of help to us in any situation. We are totally on our own. What a God! It would mean the fulfillment of my prayer years ago for a Turkish translator, to come to a 10 sq foot area in 10 min about 1 am in a Dallas Texas hotel, had nothing to do with God’s activity. It would violate natural law for God to send messages/impulses or whatever to that short order cook to make him go into the hotel. That would be an utter fluke, nothing more.