I don’t know why that is so ‘revealing’ because I have been saying it throughout this thread. One can’t take all faith out of religion but one can find anchor points in the observables. My Turkish translator was one such observational anchor point for my faith. For the disciples their absolute anchor point was that they saw the risen Christ. That would change a man forever–it was observable and objective since over 500 saw him at one time, and the disciples saw him several times.
But my bedrock faith does necessarily reach down to those axiomatic foundations (presuppositions) that themselves are my premises prior to anything like science.
I don’t know quite how you can say this. Your axioms are accepted by faith. All assumptions/presuppositions/axioms are accepted as true but unproven. Some of these assumptions are that Christianity is true, that God exists, and that the other religions are false, an assumption that keeps God from being schizophrenic (telling one group one thing and another a different thing). So the question of which religion is true simply can’t be answered by knowing what your parents believed.