Daniel,
I see that Brad has already explained the problem on our site that you misunderstood. If you notice my comment above from earlier this morning, I also found the site down so I couldn’t link something I had wanted to link.
@Daniel_Mann, I never accused you of any dishonesty at all. Nor do I do so now. What did I say to give you that impression? I was simply saying that you quoted someone partially–and accurately as far as that passage went. There’s no dishonesty there. I simply pointed out that Giberson then said some things that aren’t consistent with the larger conclusion you were drawing. That’s about interpretation and full accuracy, not dishonesty.