@T_aquaticus,
Well, yes, I suppose so. But that’s where the wisdom of the Founding Fathers comes into the picture. Rather than having lots of disputes between different faiths and denominations about proving what is True Morality vs. “Someone Else’s Flawed” perception of Morality - - the Founding Fathers wrote a constitution which became the basis for “Separation of Church and State”.
The Laws of the Land are civil laws rather than “theocratical” rules (like Sharia?) … and while Roe v. Wade is a civil law landmark, we still have lots of denominations and sects agonizing over the ruling not being based on religious morality.
But this is beside the point, from your Atheist view. You, I assume?, don’t even like to see people believing in a deity they can’t prove. I think you’ll get over that reaction over time. Many religious people don’t like to see people not believing in a deity at all. And they’ll get over that reaction (or not) as their [you say, imaginary] God gives them the wisdom to see the problem.
My point is unchanged in one regard: most of us Theists believe a person can be Reasonable about his or her faith - - even when there is insufficient Evidence of a deity’s existence for a Logic professor to call Proof.
In law, there are different standards of Evidence. From all those Law & Order shows, we are all familiar with the Evidentiary Standard of “Guilt Proved Beyond All Reasonable Doubt”. That’s tough standard.
But in civil cases, like the one brought against O.J. after he was found innocent in a criminal courtroom, the lower standard was for “a preponderance of the evidence”. And on that basis, the decision was found in Favor of the Plaintiff (a civil plaintiff) … against OJ, the civil defendant.
So, in matters of Faith, I think it is reasonable for a Theist to make his or her decision on an evidentiary standard like “preponderance of evidence” or even a lesser standard like, say, the one represented by Pascal’s Wager.
It’s a personal matter… and Logic, as applied enthusiastically by Atheists, really isn’t the point.